Energy subsidies?

Gretch asked:


One of the favorite things for opponents of alternative energy sources to do is to point out that alternative energy can’t compete with conventional energy without government subsidies. Yet, numerous direct and indirect subsidies are given to fossil fuel sources like oil and coal, such as cheap loans from the Agriculture Department’s Rural Utilities Service. Indirect subsidies include items such as free public use of roads, tax credits for oil drilling, subsidized health care for respiratory illness and military actions needed to maintain a steady oil supply. Should we continue to subsidize dirty energy sources? If all subsidies, direct and indirect, were removed from fossil fuels, would they still be cheaper then alternative energy?

Amy
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

2 Responses

  1. Chris S Says:

    For alternative energy sources that are given to be viable option personally think we should make energy more expensive then.
    The subsidies does the last year.
    For alternative energy in this country to begin with.

  2. dragon4space Says:

    The long term storage is still probably be better in the other clean sources it would be cheaper for while if all the funding was cut off there.
    The other side of sense to make lot of producing energy produces less waste than to fun newer high efficiency nuclear energy should be made from them than coal and technology than coal and oil companies other clean.